Jackson v. State

118 So. 3d 285, 2013 WL 3866765, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11880
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12710
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2013·No. No. 1D12-6065·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellants judgments and sentences, but remand for the trial court to enter an order revoking his probation and specifying the conditions of probation that he was found to have violated. See Leggs v. State, 27 So.3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (affirming, in an Anders appeal, the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remanding with directions that the trial court enter an order specifying the conditions of probation violated). Appellant need not be present. See Baldwin v. State, 855 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (remanding for entry of a written revocation order conforming to the oral pronouncement in an Anders appeal).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 118 So. 3d 285, 2013 WL 3866765, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11880 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

118 So. 3d 285 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Baldwin v. State
855 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Leggs v. State
27 So. 3d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)