Jackson v. State
969 So. 2d 1147, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18705, 2007 WL 3408370
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2007·No. No. 2D07-2151·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000, 1008 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding that procedural requirements of section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), do not violate constitutional ex post facto clauses); Fletcher v. State, 699 So.2d 346, 347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (holding that sexual predator registration requirements are regulatory in nature and do not constitute punishment subject to constitutional ex post facto challenges).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 969 So. 2d 1147, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18705, 2007 WL 3408370 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
969 So. 2d 1147 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newsome v. Butterworth
969 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)