Jackson v. State

918 So. 2d 393, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 243, 2006 WL 88484
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 2006·No. No. 1D05-4067·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s dismissal of his rule 3.800(a) motion for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court found that because appellant had a pending appeal of the trial court’s order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion, the trial court was without jurisdiction to hear appellant’s instant postconviction motion. However, as no appeal was pending with this Court, the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. Cf Bates v. State, 704 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Kimmel v. State, 629 So.2d 1110, 1111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, the trial court’s order is reversed and appellant’s motion is remanded to the trial court for consideration on the merits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

KAHN, C.J., LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 918 So. 2d 393, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 243, 2006 WL 88484 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

918 So. 2d 393 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo
918 So. 2d 393 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)