Jackson v. State

817 So. 2d 927, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6144, 2002 WL 1378808
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 2002·No. No. 2D01-777·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Michael Jackson challenges his convictions and sentence imposed pursuant to the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act (PRR), section 775.082(9)(a)(l)(q), Florida Statutes (2000), for burglary of a dwelling and felony petit theft. We affirm the convictions without discussion.

The State concedes that we must reverse Jackson’s PRR sentence for burglary of a dwelling. Because it is undisputed that, the dwelling was unoccupied, the PRR cannot be used to enhance Jackson’s sentence. See State v. Huggins, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla.2001). Accordingly, we reverse Jackson’s sentence and remand for resen-tencing without the minimum mandatory sentence imposed under the PRR.

CASANUEVA and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 817 So. 2d 927, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6144, 2002 WL 1378808 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

817 So. 2d 927 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Higginbotham v. State
833 So. 2d 883 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)