Jackson v. State

685 So. 2d 7, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10926, 1996 WL 590776
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1996·No. No. 95-3100·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence following an order that he violated probation by committing the substantive offense of loitering and prowling. However, we remand for modification of the violation of probation order by striking, as a ground for violation, Appellant’s failure to attend Narcotics Anonymous or Alcoholics Anonymous meetings.

As to his failure to attend meetings, the only adverse evidence concerned his not submitting a written document required by the probation officer that would confirm his attendance. However, the evidence does not reflect that his failing to submit the written document prior to his arrest on the substantive offense was willful. E.g., Frazier v. State, 587 So.2d 660 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The record does support the finding that Appellant violated his probation by committing the substantive offense.

GUNTHER, C.J., and STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 685 So. 2d 7, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10926, 1996 WL 590776 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

685 So. 2d 7 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singleton v. State
891 So. 2d 1226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)