Jackson v. State
599 So. 2d 275, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6389, 1992 WL 112118
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1992·No. No. 91-02618·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court imposed a sentence which exceeds the permissible range of the sentencing guidelines, without giving written reasons for the departure. We reverse and remand for resentencing. At the time of sentencing, the trial court did not know that the sentence imposed was a departure sentence. Accordingly, on remand the court may again depart from the guidelines if valid written reasons for departure are given. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 599 So. 2d 275, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6389, 1992 WL 112118 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
599 So. 2d 275 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trotter v. State
705 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)