Jackson v. State
401 So. 2d 1115, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19232
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 1981·No. No. 80-746·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The sole issue on this appeal is the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the penalties for grand theft. The appellant was convicted as charged and contends he is entitled to a new trial. We are compelled to reverse and remand for a new trial in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. State, 401 So. 2d 1115, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19232 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
401 So. 2d 1115 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crislip v. Holland
401 So. 2d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)