Jackson v. State

400 So. 2d 173, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20318
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 382 So. 2d 749
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1981·No. No. 80-1105·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction based on circumstantial evidence, see, e. g., Anderson v. State, 354 So.2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 359 So.2d 1210 (Fla.1978); Miller v. State, 270 So.2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So.2d 16 (Fla.1973); Wright v. State, 269 So.2d 60 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972), cert. denied 274 So.2d 235 (Fla.1973), and uphold the jury finding that the evidence is inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See, e. g., McArthur v. State, 351 So.2d 972 (Fla.1977); Diaz v. State, 387 So.2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 400 So. 2d 173, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20318 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

400 So. 2d 173 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McArthur v. State
351 So. 2d 972 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Diaz v. State
387 So. 2d 978 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Wright v. State
269 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Miller v. State
270 So. 2d 423 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Anderson v. State
354 So. 2d 395 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)