Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Jackson v. State

921 So. 2d 611, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 53, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 34, 2006 WL 176688

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 26, 2006

DocketNo. SC05-654

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 921 So. 2d 611 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. State, 921 So. 2d 611, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 53, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 34, 2006 WL 176688 (Fla. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PARIENTE, C.J.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Jackson v. State, 895 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), a decision which the Second District Court of Appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Subsequently, the Fifth District decided Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), in which the Fifth District distinguished its prior opinion in Johnson and agreed with the Second District that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Based on the Fifth District’s decision in Bouno, we have determined that we should decline to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARIENTE, C.J.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Jackson v. State, 895 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), a decision which the Second District Court of Appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Subsequently, the Fifth District decided Bouno v. State, 900 So.2d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), in which the Fifth District distinguished its prior opinion in Johnson and agreed with the Second District that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Based on the Fifth District’s decision in Bouno, we have determined that we should decline to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

921 So. 2d 611, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 53, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 34, 2006 WL 176688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-fla-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack