Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Jackson v. State

340 So. 2d 470, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4609

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 7, 1976·No. No. 49123·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We entered our order allowing certiorari and dispensing with oral argument in this case because of conflict between the decision rendered by the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 328 So.2d 457, and Edwards v. State, 223 So.2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). We have reviewed the arguments of counsel as presented in their briefs submitted to this Court.

The conflict of decision between the instant case and Edwards, supra, having been resolved in King v. State, Fla., 339 So.2d 172, opinion filed this day, the writ of cer-tiorari issued herein is discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We entered our order allowing certiorari and dispensing with oral argument in this case because of conflict between the decision rendered by the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 328 So.2d 457, and Edwards v. State, 223 So.2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). We have reviewed the arguments of counsel as presented in their briefs submitted to this Court.

The conflict of decision between the instant case and Edwards, supra, having been resolved in King v. State, Fla., 339 So.2d 172, opinion filed this day, the writ of cer-tiorari issued herein is discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur.

Jackson v. State, 340 So. 2d 470, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4609 (Fla. 1976).

Pincite

340 So. 2d 470 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related