Jackson v. State

117 So. 157, 217 Ala. 563, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 66
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 24, 1928·No. 8 Div. 27.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

' GARDNER, J.

Petition for certiorari to-review the decision of the Court of Appeals, affirming a judgment of conviction of petitioner on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still.

As to some of the matters here pressed for consideration, they present a finding of facts by the Court of Appeals, here not re-viewable under our uniform decisions. Postal Tel. Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

The remaining questions argued wer.enot treated or considered by the Court of Appeals, and do not come within the purview' of our review of the-decisions of that court. Ex parte L. & N. R. Co., 176 Ala. 631, 58 So. 315 ; Parham v. State (Ala. Sup.) 116 So. 418. 1

The writ is denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BOÜLDIN, JJ., concur.
1

Ante, p. 399.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 117 So. 157, 217 Ala. 563, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 66 (Ala. 1928).

117 So. 157 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skipper v. State
124 So. 118 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Hardy v. First Nat. Bank of Jacksonville
122 So. 702 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Ballard v. State
121 So. 502 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)