Jackson v. State

47 So. 77, 156 Ala. 93, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 41
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 18, 1908·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.

The defendant should have been permitted, upon cross-examination, to show bias on the part of the witness Dinah Wright. She had testified against him, and said that she was on friendly terms with him, and the defendant clearly had the right, on cross-examination, to show that he had gotten some of her land, and that she had made the remarks in question, which indicated ill feeling on her part towards the defendant. — Rarden v. Cunningham, 136 Ala. 266, 34 South. 26; Drum & Ezekiel v. Harrison, 83 Ala. 386, 3 South. 715.

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause, is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Tyson, C. J., and Dowdell and McClellan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 47 So. 77, 156 Ala. 93, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 41 (Ala. 1908).

47 So. 77 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cowan v. State
72 So. 578 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Dennison v. State
72 So. 589 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Barr v. State
61 So. 39 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)