Jackson v. State
This text of 142 Ala. 55 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While the record discloses a plea in abatement to the affidavit, upon which the defendant was arrested and tried, it does not show any disposition whatever of the plea. The judgment entry affirmatively shows that issue was joined upon the plea of not guilty, which excludes any assumption that the issue was joined on the plea in abatement. There is, therefore, no room for the application of the principle that the finding of the court was erroneous in failing to respond to the issue presented by the plea in abatement. — Dannelley v. State, 130 Ala. 132, 135.
No error appearing on the record, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 Ala. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-ala-1904.