Jackson v. State

142 Ala. 55
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1904·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

TYSON, J.

While the record discloses a plea in abatement to the affidavit, upon which the defendant was arrested and tried, it does not show any disposition whatever of the plea. The judgment entry affirmatively shows that issue was joined upon the plea of not guilty, which excludes any assumption that the issue was joined on the plea in abatement. There is, therefore, no room for the application of the principle that the finding of the court was erroneous in failing to respond to the issue presented by the plea in abatement. — Dannelley v. State, 130 Ala. 132, 135.

No error appearing on the record, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 142 Ala. 55 (Ala. 1904).

142 Ala. 55 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broadus v. Broadus
217 So. 2d 811 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)
Fraser v. State Ex Rel. Biggs
113 So. 289 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
Baker v. State
95 So. 467 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Thomas v. State
92 So. 241 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1921)
Toney v. State
72 So. 508 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Doss v. Wadsworth Red Ash Coal Co.
64 So. 341 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Providence Saving Life Insurance Society v. Pruett
47 So. 1019 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)