Jackson v. Segars

454 A.2d 640, 308 Pa. Super. 488, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2373
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 14, 1983·No. No. 195·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint for failure to file a certificate of readiness pursuant to the “240 Day Rule” and Philadelphia R.Civ.P. 151. Procedurally the posture of the proceedings in the court below is similar to that in Johnson v. Keystone Insurance Company, 299 Pa.Super. 187, 445 A.2d 517 (1982). There, as here, a hearing had been held before a Master, at which appellant attempted to show good cause for his failure to comply. However, there was no record of that hearing, and the Master did not file a report. A panel of this Court vacated the order dismissing the complaint and remanded so that the trial court could complete and clarify the record. See also: Sunbury v. Home Insurance Company, 303 Pa.Super. 407, 449 A.2d 752 (1982) and Brooks v. Schachtel, 303 Pa.Super. 408, 449 A.2d 752 (1982). For similar reasons, the order in the instant case is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. Jurisdiction is not retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Segars, 454 A.2d 640, 308 Pa. Super. 488, 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2373 (Pa. Ct. App. 1983).

454 A.2d 640 (Jackson v. Segars) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Keystone Insurance
445 A.2d 517 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Sunbury v. Home Insurance
449 A.2d 752 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Brooks v. Schachtel
449 A.2d 752 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)