Jackson v. Schechter

2 A.D.2d 970, 158 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529

This text of 2 A.D.2d 970 (Jackson v. Schechter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Schechter, 2 A.D.2d 970, 158 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. While it is not incumbent upon petitioners, in order to sustain their position, to show that operators are performing all the duties of dispatcher, their claim here must nevertheless be rejected since they have failed to show that the operators are performing the fundamental duties of a dispatcher, which are in the main supervisory in nature. Concur — Botein, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.2d 970, 158 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-schechter-nyappdiv-1956.