Jackson v. Saul

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama
DecidedJuly 2, 2021
Docket1:20-cv-00398
StatusUnknown

This text of Jackson v. Saul (Jackson v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Saul, (S.D. Ala. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

CARMISA D. JACKSON, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 20-0398-MU

ANDREW M. SAUL, : Commissioner of Social Security, : Defendant.

JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff benefits be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), see Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 111 S.Ct. 2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991), for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. The remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes the Plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993), and terminates this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter. DONE this the 2nd day of July, 2021. s/P. Bradley Murray UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson v. Saul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-saul-alsd-2021.