Jackson v. Richey Amusement Co.

126 So. 746, 99 Fla. 578
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 18, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 746 (Jackson v. Richey Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Richey Amusement Co., 126 So. 746, 99 Fla. 578 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Buford, J.

This was a suit instituted by a Bill in Chancery to cancel a lease agreement filed by the owner against the lessee.

The alleged lease agreement does not appear in the record as a part of the Bill of Complaint, or otherwise.

There was a demurrer to the bill of complaint which, amongst other grounds, raised the point that there was no equity in the bill. The demurrer was over-ruled.

The Bill of Complaint does not allege sufficient facts as to show the complainant is entitled to relief in a court of equity and, therefore, the demurrer should have been sustained.

The decree appealed from is reversed.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Strum, J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 746, 99 Fla. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-richey-amusement-co-fla-1930.