Jackson v. Rentrop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. Rentrop

196 A.D. 980

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D. 980 (Jackson v. Rentrop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Rentrop, 196 A.D. 980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. It was the duty of the court to dispose of all the issues raised by the pleadings, both legal and equitable, and at the conclusion of the trial to grant such relief as the facts proved warranted, either legal or equitable. (City of New York v. Matthews, 213 N. Y. 563; Wasserman v. Taubin, 129 App. Div. 691.) Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. It was the duty of the court to dispose of all the issues raised by the pleadings, both legal and equitable, and at the conclusion of the trial to grant such relief as the facts proved warranted, either legal or equitable. (City of New York v. Matthews, 213 N. Y. 563; Wasserman v. Taubin, 129 App. Div. 691.) Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D. 980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-rentrop-nyappdiv-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack