Jackson v. Redfern Co.

172 A.D. 892

This text of 172 A.D. 892 (Jackson v. Redfern Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Redfern Co., 172 A.D. 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Order in so far as appealed from, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion in its entirety granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that, according to the well-settled practice as established by many decisions, the defendant is entitled to have a full bill of particulars as asked for in the notice of motion. (See American Woolen Co. of New York v. Altkrug, 137 App. Div. 621; Rhodes v. Adams, 113 id. 304; Dempsey v. Bergen County Traction Co., 74 id. 474; Dwyer v. Slattery, 118 id. 345; Hoareau v. Schwartzkopf, 142 id. 69, 70; Havholm v. Whale Creek Iron Works, 159 id. 578, 582.) Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Woolen Co. v. Altkrug
137 A.D. 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-redfern-co-nyappdiv-1915.