Jackson v. Raleigh Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. Raleigh Associates, Inc.

273 A.D. 1002, 79 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5702

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 1948·Published

Opinion

We think that the applicability of the defenses set up in the amended replies should await the trial. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve amended replies to the answers of the defendants unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 821.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We think that the applicability of the defenses set up in the amended replies should await the trial. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve amended replies to the answers of the defendants unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 821.]

Jackson v. Raleigh Associates, Inc., 273 A.D. 1002, 79 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

273 A.D. 1002 (Jackson v. Raleigh Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.