Jackson v. Railroad Retirement Board
This text of 76 F. App'x 750 (Jackson v. Railroad Retirement Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Odis Jackson petitions for review of the Railroad Retirement Board’s (Board’s) final decision denying his application for an annuity increase. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Worms v. Railroad Retirement 13d., 255 F.3d 502, 505 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review), we affirm. Jackson has identified no legal authority— and we have found none — to support his position that he is entitled to an annuity increase based on his minor grandson retroactive to February 1993. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Board. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 F. App'x 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-railroad-retirement-board-ca8-2003.