Jackson v. R. E. Dietz Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. R. E. Dietz Co.

59 A.D.2d 632, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13485

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 632 (Jackson v. R. E. Dietz Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. R. E. Dietz Co., 59 A.D.2d 632, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 800.12 [App Div, 3d Dept]) granted, without costs, and the clerk is directed to accept appellant’s record and brief provided they are filed and served on or before December 5, 1977. Motion by appellant for permission to proceed as a poor person granted, without costs, only to extent that the appeal may be heard upon one copy of the record and seven copies of a brief and appendix. If appellant is unable, within this time period, to file a record in compliance with section 17 of the board’s rules (12 NYCRR 300.18), the [633]*633appeal need not be perfected upon a record certified by the board. In such case, the appeal may be heard upon a single copy of the record the contents of which shall be certified in the manner specified by the Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 800.7 [b]). (See Matter of Garcia v Brassiere Rest., 59 AD2d 628.) Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion pursuant to section 800.12 of the Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 800.12 [App Div, 3d Dept]) granted, without costs, and the clerk is directed to accept appellant’s record and brief provided they are filed and served on or before December 5, 1977. Motion by appellant for permission to proceed as a poor person granted, without costs, only to extent that the appeal may be heard upon one copy of the record and seven copies of a brief and appendix. If appellant is unable, within this time period, to file a record in compliance with section 17 of the board’s rules (12 NYCRR 300.18), the [633]*633appeal need not be perfected upon a record certified by the board. In such case, the appeal may be heard upon a single copy of the record the contents of which shall be certified in the manner specified by the Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 800.7 [b]). (See Matter of Garcia v Brassiere Rest., 59 AD2d 628.) Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 632, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-r-e-dietz-co-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack