Jackson v. O'Hara

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jackson v. O'Hara

38 A. 624, 183 Pa. 233, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 746

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 8, 1897

DocketAppeal, No. 64

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 38 A. 624 (Jackson v. O'Hara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. O'Hara, 38 A. 624, 183 Pa. 233, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 746 (Pa. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the judgment entered by the court below against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. For reasons given by the court we think there was no error in “holding that the facts set forth in the defendants’ affidavit of defense ” do not constitute a defense to the plaintiff’s cause of [238]*238action; and hence there was no' error in making the rule for judgment absolute.

The judgment is affirmed for reasons given in the opinion of .the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from the judgment entered by the court below against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. For reasons given by the court we think there was no error in “holding that the facts set forth in the defendants’ affidavit of defense ” do not constitute a defense to the plaintiff’s cause of [238]*238action; and hence there was no' error in making the rule for judgment absolute.

The judgment is affirmed for reasons given in the opinion of .the court below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A. 624, 183 Pa. 233, 1897 Pa. LEXIS 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-ohara-pa-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack