Jackson v. Norris

256 F. App'x 12
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 2007
DocketNo. 07-1331
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 256 F. App'x 12 (Jackson v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Norris, 256 F. App'x 12 (8th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of this court’s recent decision in Simpson v. Norris, 490 F.3d 1029, 1034-1036 (8th Cir.2007) (concluding the existence of an Arkansas statute that precluded the execution of the mentally retarded was irrelevant to whether the applicant had defaulted an Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 321, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), claim by failing to bring the claim under the statute), reh’g en banc denied, 499 F.3d 874 (8th Cir.2007), we reverse and vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings. See Simpson, 490 F.3d at 1035-36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rankin v. Payne
E.D. Arkansas, 2023
Alvin Jackson v. Dexter Payne
9 F.4th 646 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)
Alvin Jackson v. Wendy Kelley
898 F.3d 859 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
Jackson v. Norris
615 F.3d 959 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Andrew Sasser v. Larry Norris
Eighth Circuit, 2009
Sasser v. Norris
553 F.3d 1121 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 F. App'x 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-norris-ca8-2007.