Jackson v. Norris

256 F. App'x 12
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2007·No. No. 07-1331·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of this court’s recent decision in Simpson v. Norris, 490 F.3d 1029, 1034-1036 (8th Cir.2007) (concluding the existence of an Arkansas statute that precluded the execution of the mentally retarded was irrelevant to whether the applicant had defaulted an Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 321, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), claim by failing to bring the claim under the statute), reh’g en banc denied, 499 F.3d 874 (8th Cir.2007), we reverse and vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings. See Simpson, 490 F.3d at 1035-36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Norris, 256 F. App'x 12 (8th Cir. 2007).

256 F. App'x 12 (Jackson v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rankin v. Payne
E.D. Arkansas, 2023
Alvin Jackson v. Dexter Payne
9 F.4th 646 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)
Alvin Jackson v. Wendy Kelley
898 F.3d 859 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
Jackson v. Norris
615 F.3d 959 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Andrew Sasser v. Larry Norris
Eighth Circuit, 2009
Sasser v. Norris
553 F.3d 1121 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)