Jackson v. New York Shipbuilding Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Jackson v. New York Shipbuilding Corp.

191 A. 289, 15 N.J. Misc. 367, 1937 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 164

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 12, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The prosecutor seeks a writ of certiorari to bring up a judgment entered in the Camden Common Pleas in a workmen’s compensation case reversing a judgment entered in the workmen’s compensation bureau. It was considered in the bureau that the medical testimony on behalf of the employer carried the weight; wherefore the petition for compensation was there dismissed. The Pleas, on appeal, came to the opposite conclusion and found for the workman. Our reading of the testimony brings us to the conclusion that a debatable factual question is presented of such balance that, under the circumstances, the writ should go. It will be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The prosecutor seeks a writ of certiorari to bring up a judgment entered in the Camden Common Pleas in a workmen’s compensation case reversing a judgment entered in the workmen’s compensation bureau. It was considered in the bureau that the medical testimony on behalf of the employer carried the weight; wherefore the petition for compensation was there dismissed. The Pleas, on appeal, came to the opposite conclusion and found for the workman. Our reading of the testimony brings us to the conclusion that a debatable factual question is presented of such balance that, under the circumstances, the writ should go. It will be allowed.

Jackson v. New York Shipbuilding Corp., 191 A. 289, 15 N.J. Misc. 367, 1937 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 164 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

191 A. 289 (Jackson v. New York Shipbuilding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related