Jackson v. New Amsterdam Gas Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. New Amsterdam Gas Co.

27 Misc. 777, 57 N.Y.S. 753

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Misc. 777 (Jackson v. New Amsterdam Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. New Amsterdam Gas Co., 27 Misc. 777, 57 N.Y.S. 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Freedman, P. J.

There is a direct conflict of testimony on the questions of fact arising in this case, and the trial court decided in favor of the plaintiff.

The record does not disclose that injustice has been done, nor . does it show- either bias, prejudice, or partiality, or that- it is against the weight of evidence. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

MacLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, P. J.

There is a direct conflict of testimony on the questions of fact arising in this case, and the trial court decided in favor of the plaintiff.

The record does not disclose that injustice has been done, nor . does it show- either bias, prejudice, or partiality, or that- it is against the weight of evidence. The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed.

MacLean and Leventritt, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Misc. 777, 57 N.Y.S. 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-new-amsterdam-gas-co-nyappterm-1899.