Jackson v. Najera
This text of Jackson v. Najera (Jackson v. Najera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3
4 ROBERT JACKSON, Case No. 2:20-cv-02100-KJD-DJA 5 Petitioner, 6 ORDER v. 7 GABRIELA NAJERA, et al., 8 Respondents. 9
10 11 In this habeas corpus action, on June 13, 2022, the Court denied pro se Petitioner Robert 12 Jackson’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, and judgment was entered accordingly. See Order 13 entered June 13, 2022 (ECF No. 29); Judgment (ECF No. 30). The Court denied Jackson a 14 certificate of appealability. Ibid. Jackson appealed, and on May 12, 2023, the Ninth Circuit Court 15 of Appeals denied Jackson’s request in that court for a certificate of appealability. Order of Court 16 of Appeals filed May 12, 2023 (ECF No. 36). 17 On June 1, 2023, Jackson filed a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 38) and a 18 motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) (ECF No. 39) seeking relief from this 19 Court’s order entered September 30, 2021 (ECF No. 23) dismissing certain claims from his 20 petition. On June 14, 2023, the respondents filed an opposition to Jackson’s motion for relief 21 from the September 30, 2021, order (ECF No. 41). 22 On June 26, 2023, Jackson filed a document entitled Notice of Non-Service of 23 Documents to Petitioner, and Motion for Enlargement of Time to Reply, and Motion for Oral 24 Arguments (ECF Nos. 42, 43, 44). 25 In his June 26 filing, Jackson states that he has not been receiving service of documents 26 filed in this action. That is likely because Jackson has been transferred from High Desert State 27 Prison to Southern Desert Correctional Center but has not filed a notice of change of address 1 docket for this case with respect to the prison where Jackson is incarcerated and will direct the 2 Clerk to send to Jackson filings he may not have received. 3 In his June 26 filing, Jackson also requests an extension of time to file a reply to 4 Respondents’ opposition to his motion for relief from the September 30, 2021, order. Good cause 5 appearing, the Court will grant that motion and will extend the time for Jackson’s reply. 6 In his June 26 filing, Jackson also requests oral argument, apparently with respect to his 7 motion for relief from the September 30, 2021, order. Jackson does not show oral argument to be 8 warranted, so this request will therefore be denied. If the Court subsequently determines that oral 9 argument is called for, the Court will set oral argument and notify the parties. 10 State prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to appointed counsel 11 unless the circumstances indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent due process 12 violations. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Kreiling v. Field, 431 13 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam)). The court may, however, appoint counsel at any 14 stage of the proceedings if the interests of justice so require. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also 15 Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. The Court determines that 16 appointment of counsel is unwarranted at this time in this case. 17 IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment 18 of Counsel (ECF No. 38) is DENIED. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 43) is 20 GRANTED. Petitioner will have until and including August 11, 2023, to file a reply to 21 Respondents’ opposition to his motion for relief from the September 30, 2021, order. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Oral Argument (ECF No. 44) 23 is DENIED. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to:
25 - administratively reopen this case;
26 - update the docket, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), to reflect that Gabriela Najera is substituted for Calvin 27 Johnson as the respondent warden; at Southern Desert Correctional Center (P.O. Box 208, Indian 1 Springs, Nevada 89070-0208); and 2 - transmit to Petitioner copies of the filings at ECF Nos. 36 and 41. 3 4 Dated this 6th day of July 2023.
6 =\ oo, 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jackson v. Najera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-najera-nvd-2023.