Jackson v. Mullen

272 A.D.2d 1075

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1075 (Jackson v. Mullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Mullen, 272 A.D.2d 1075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Opinion

In an action for an accounting, specific performance, and for an injunction, order denying defendants’ motion for a bill of particulars, and plaintiffs’ cross motion for examination of defendants before trial and for a discovery and inspection, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. (Child v. O’Rourke, 122 App. Div. 325; Del Genovese V. Del Genovese, 149 App. Div. 266.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell and Sneed, JJ., concur; Johnston and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to grant the motions, with the following memorandum: Under the facts disclosed by the pleadings, plaintiffs were entitled to an examination before trial and defendants were entitled to a bill of particulars.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Child v. O'Rourke
122 A.D. 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Del Genovese v. Del Genovese
149 A.D. 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-mullen-nyappdiv-1947.