Jackson v. Morton

266 So. 3d 283
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 18, 2019
DocketNo. 2019-C-0121
StatusPublished

This text of 266 So. 3d 283 (Jackson v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Morton, 266 So. 3d 283 (La. 2019).

Opinion

JOHNSON, C.J., would grant.

HUGHES, J., would grant and assigns reasons.

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

The mortgage was recorded before the donation. Therefore the donated property was subject to the mortgage. While the donee cannot be held personally responsible for payment of the debt secured by the *284mortgage, or made to reimburse the donor for payments on the mortgage, when the property is sold the mortgage must be satisfied prior to the claim of the donee, as the mortgage primes the donation. Thus the donee is entitled to one-half of the net proceeds from the sale.

The post-sale distribution, after the mortgage is satisfied, is a claim different from the matters previously litigated between the parties, and is not subject to the exception of res judicata.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 So. 3d 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-morton-la-2019.