Jackson v. Miller

Fourth Circuit

Jackson v. Miller

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 2004

Docket04-6491

StatusUnpublished

This text of Jackson v. Miller (Jackson v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Miller, (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6491

JERRY BERNARD JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KELLY MILLER, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts; SEAN F. PERRIN, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts; KATHLEEN K. LUCCHESI, prosecutor at Mecklenburg County courts,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-12-3)

Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 20, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Bernard Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerry Bernard Jackson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Defendants were

entitled to absolute immunity. See Jackson v. Miller, No.

CA-04-12-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI