Jackson v. Miller

Fourth Circuit

Jackson v. Miller

96 F. App'x 921

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2004·No. No. 04-6491·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Bernard Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Defendants were entitled to absolute immunity. See Jackson v. Miller, No. CA-04-12-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Bernard Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s reasoning that Defendants were entitled to absolute immunity. See Jackson v. Miller, No. CA-04-12-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Jackson v. Miller, 96 F. App'x 921 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

96 F. App'x 921 (Jackson v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related