Jackson v. Menter Co.
93 S.E. 255, 20 Ga. App. 666, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023
This text of 93 S.E. 255 (Jackson v. Menter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jackson v. Menter Co., 93 S.E. 255, 20 Ga. App. 666, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
The judge of the superior court should have sustained the certiorari, because (a) the general demurrer to the cause of action should have been sustained; (6) the evidence demanded a verdict in.favor of the defendant in the trial court. Mayer v. Southern Express Co., 17 Ga. App. 744 (88 S. E. 403).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Culverhouse v. Atlanta Ass'n for Convalescent Aged Persons, Inc.
194 S.E.2d 299 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Southern Railway Co. v. Grizzle
165 S.E. 149 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Walker v. Industrial Stores Co.
140 S.E. 519 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 255, 20 Ga. App. 666, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-menter-co-gactapp-1917.