Jackson v. Magana

667 F. App'x 791
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6031
StatusPublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 791 (Jackson v. Magana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Magana, 667 F. App'x 791 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel R. Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and several related orders. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction to the extent it challenges the denial of Jackson’s request for a temporary restraining order. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc., 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976) (observing that orders granting or denying temporary restraining order are not generally appealable). With respect to Jackson’s other claims, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error; thus, we affirm the district court’s orders as to these claims for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Magana, No. 5:13-ct-03295-FL, 2015 WL 7459810 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-magana-ca4-2016.