Jackson v. Long

Eighth Circuit

Jackson v. Long

308 F. App'x 24

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 2009

DocketNos. 08-1435, 08-1826

StatusPublished

This text of 308 F. App'x 24 (Jackson v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Long, 308 F. App'x 24 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Jackson appeals the district court’s¹ orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, denying him leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP), and denying him appointment of counsel to pursue this appeal. We grant his pending motion to proceed IFP in this court, but note that the district court has already assessed and is collecting the appellate filing fee, so no further assessment is necessary. We affirm the district court’s orders for the reasons given by the court, see 8th Cir. R. 47A(a), and we deny Jackson’s pending motion for appointment of counsel on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Larry Jackson appeals the district court’s¹ orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, denying him leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP), and denying him appointment of counsel to pursue this appeal. We grant his pending motion to proceed IFP in this court, but note that the district court has already assessed and is collecting the appellate filing fee, so no further assessment is necessary. We affirm the district court’s orders for the reasons given by the court, see 8th Cir. R. 47A(a), and we deny Jackson’s pending motion for appointment of counsel on appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 F. App'x 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-long-ca8-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack