Jackson v. Leelanaw Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Jackson v. Leelanaw Circuit Judge

65 N.W. 230, 107 Mich. 332

DecidedDecember 10, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.W. 230 (Jackson v. Leelanaw Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Leelanaw Circuit Judge, 65 N.W. 230, 107 Mich. 332 (Mich. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Grant, J.

The relator brought suit in assumpsit against one Martin, and garnished one Dailey. Dailey filed a written disclosure denying any indebtedness, or the possession of any property, etc., belonging to Martin. Relator obtained judgment against the principal defendant. He also filed a demand for the examination of the garnishee, and a trial was had, which resulted in finding that he had in his possession $280 belonging to the principal defendant, and a judgment was rendered against him for enough to satisfy the judgment against the principal defendant. Relator then gave due notice of the taxation of costs by the clerk, which were taxed at $45.20. Upon appeal to the court, the judge set this taxation aside, and ordered that neither party should recover costs.

The plaintiff was entitled to his costs' against the gar[333]*333nishee, under 2 How. Stat. § 8073. Strong v. Hollon, 39 Mich. 411.

The writ must issue.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, J.

The relator brought suit in assumpsit against one Martin, and garnished one Dailey. Dailey filed a written disclosure denying any indebtedness, or the possession of any property, etc., belonging to Martin. Relator obtained judgment against the principal defendant. He also filed a demand for the examination of the garnishee, and a trial was had, which resulted in finding that he had in his possession $280 belonging to the principal defendant, and a judgment was rendered against him for enough to satisfy the judgment against the principal defendant. Relator then gave due notice of the taxation of costs by the clerk, which were taxed at $45.20. Upon appeal to the court, the judge set this taxation aside, and ordered that neither party should recover costs.

The plaintiff was entitled to his costs' against the gar[333]*333nishee, under 2 How. Stat. § 8073. Strong v. Hollon, 39 Mich. 411.

The writ must issue.

The other Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 N.W. 230, 107 Mich. 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-leelanaw-circuit-judge-mich-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack