Jackson v. King County Adult Corrections
This text of Jackson v. King County Adult Corrections (Jackson v. King County Adult Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3
4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 DAWNTE JACKSON, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-569 8 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 v. 10 KING COUNTY et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 On May 29, 2024, Plaintiff Dawnte Jackson and King County Defendants 14 jointly moved to “dismiss this case with prejudice because the parties agree that the 15 Prison Litigation Reform Act bars this case due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his 16 administrative remedies.” Dkt. No. 20 (emphasis added). The parties stipulated that 17 “Mr. Jackson filed grievance #1221-029 regarding this incident, but he failed to 18 appeal it in accordance with King County Jail grievance procedures.” Id. 19 In cases that are dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies 20 under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), the general practice is 21 to dismiss without prejudice, thereby allowing claimants to re-file after satisfying 22 the exhaustion requirement. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1200-1201 (9th 23 1 Cir. 2002) (“Requiring dismissal without prejudice when there is no presuit 2 exhaustion... will further... Congressional objectives|.]”); Ornelas v. Giurbino, 358 3 F. Supp. 2d 955, 962 (S.D. Cal. 2005) (“The dismissal, however, is without prejudice. 4 Thus, Plaintiff may re-file a new action after Section 1997e(a) has been satisfied, 5 is after Plaintiff exhausts his administrative remedies as to all Defendants and 6 any and all claims raised against them.”). 7 Here, Plaintiff and Defendants request this Court to apply the PLRA 8 exhaustion requirement to dismiss Plaintiffs claim with prejudice. See Dkt. No. 20. 9 Because this request deviates from general practice, the Court ORDERS the parties show cause, in writing, within fourteen (14) days of this Order, why dismissal 11 should be with prejudice. 12 The Clerk of the Court is directed to place this Order to Show Cause on the 18 Court’s calendar for September 17, 2024. 14 It is so ORDERED. 15 Dated this 3rd day of September, 2024. 16 po le-— 18 JamalN. Whitehead 19 United States District Judge
20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jackson v. King County Adult Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-king-county-adult-corrections-wawd-2024.