Jackson v. Kijakazi

S.D. Alabama

Jackson v. Kijakazi

DecidedOctober 4, 2023

Docket2:22-cv-00261

StatusUnknown

This text of Jackson v. Kijakazi (Jackson v. Kijakazi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Kijakazi, (S.D. Ala. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

MARILYN JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIV. A. NO. 22-0261-MU ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )

JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff benefits be REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), see Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991), for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. The remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes Plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993), and terminates this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter. DONE this the 27th day of September, 2023. s/P. BRADLEY MURRAY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

MARILYN JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIV. A. NO. 22-0261-MU ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )

JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion and order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff benefits be REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), see Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991), for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. The remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes Plaintiff a prevailing party for purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993), and terminates this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter. DONE this the 27th day of September, 2023. s/P. BRADLEY MURRAY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jackson v. Kijakazi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-kijakazi-alsd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack