Jackson v. Johnson, No. Cv93 0704124 (May 24, 1993)

Connecticut Superior Court

Jackson v. Johnson, No. Cv93 0704124 (May 24, 1993)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4992

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMay 24, 1993

DocketNo. CV93 0704124

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4992 (Jackson v. Johnson, No. Cv93 0704124 (May 24, 1993)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Johnson, No. Cv93 0704124 (May 24, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4992 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION TO REARGUE After the court's decision of May 3, 1993 denying the plaintiff's application for a prejudgment remedy, plaintiff moved to reargue. The court granted the motion and heard CT Page 4993 the new argument.

Originally the court based its decision on Brush v. Button, 36 Conn. 292 and Dunham v., Dunham, 97 Conn. 440 concluding, in effect, that probable cause did not exist because the court under those cases probably did not have original jurisdiction of guardianship account matters regarding minors. The court has now been directed to Davenport v. Olmstead, 43 Conn. 67 which distinguishes cases in which the ward has reached majority. id. 76-77. That case and its distinction was affirmatively recognized in First National Bank Trust Co. v. McCoy, 124 Conn. 111,115.

Probable cause is found and the remedy granted in the amount of $60,000.

Motion for disclosure of assets is granted with compliance within 30 days.

N. O'Neill, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION TO REARGUE After the court's decision of May 3, 1993 denying the plaintiff's application for a prejudgment remedy, plaintiff moved to reargue. The court granted the motion and heard CT Page 4993 the new argument.

Originally the court based its decision on Brush v. Button, 36 Conn. 292 and Dunham v., Dunham, 97 Conn. 440 concluding, in effect, that probable cause did not exist because the court under those cases probably did not have original jurisdiction of guardianship account matters regarding minors. The court has now been directed to Davenport v. Olmstead, 43 Conn. 67 which distinguishes cases in which the ward has reached majority. id. 76-77. That case and its distinction was affirmatively recognized in First National Bank Trust Co. v. McCoy, 124 Conn. 111,115.

Probable cause is found and the remedy granted in the amount of $60,000.

Motion for disclosure of assets is granted with compliance within 30 days.

N. O'Neill, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-johnson-no-cv93-0704124-may-24-1993-connsuperct-1993.

Opinion

N. O'Neill, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack