Jackson v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
Docket98-20048
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jackson v. Johnson (Jackson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Johnson, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

No. 98-20048 -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20048 Conference Calendar

MELVIN CHARLES JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; J. HARRISON; JOHN DOE, Unknown Physician; J.R. GABBARD,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CV-3472 -------------------- February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Melvin Charles Jackson, Texas prisoner # 580613, seeks leave

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), following the district

court’s certification that his appeal from the dismissal of his

civil-rights complaint was not taken in good faith. Jackson

argues that the district court abused its discretion in finding

that his complaints of deliberate indifference to his serious

medical needs were frivolous. Jackson has not shown that he can

bring any claims of arguable merit on appeal. Accordingly,

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-20048 -2-

Jackson’s IFP motion is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-johnson-ca5-2000.