Jackson v. Johnson
This text of Jackson v. Johnson (Jackson v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7885
KENNETH E. JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. JOHNSON, Nurse,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
S. K. YOUNG, Warden of Operations; A. P. HARVEY, Assistant Warden of Operations,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-1205-7)
Submitted: April 12, 2004 Decided: April 29, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth E. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Elizabeth Kay Dillon, GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Kenneth E. Jackson appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant Carolyn Johnson and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging deliberate
indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Johnson, No.
CA-02-1205-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jackson v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-johnson-ca4-2004.