Jackson v. Johnson
Opinion
Kenneth E. Jackson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant Carolyn Johnson and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Johnson, No. CA-02-1205-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
95 F. App'x 524 (Jackson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.