Jackson v. JMLP Enterprises, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jackson v. JMLP Enterprises, Inc.

367 S.W.3d 675, 2012 WL 2107292, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 791

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2012·No. No. ED 97187·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sarah Jackson appeals the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury’s verdict in favor of Ohio Casualty Insurance Company on her claim for underinsured [676] motorist coverage. We find that the trial court did not err in giving Instruction Number 6 to the jury.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sarah Jackson appeals the judgment of the trial court entered upon a jury’s verdict in favor of Ohio Casualty Insurance Company on her claim for underinsured [676] motorist coverage. We find that the trial court did not err in giving Instruction Number 6 to the jury.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Jackson v. JMLP Enterprises, Inc., 367 S.W.3d 675, 2012 WL 2107292, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

367 S.W.3d 675 (Jackson v. JMLP Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.