Jackson v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Jackson v. Jackson

6 Sadler 42

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 28, 1887

DocketNo. 381, E. D.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Sadler 42 (Jackson v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Jackson, 6 Sadler 42 (Pa. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

An examination of all the numerous assignments discloses no error which demands a reversal of this decree. The demurrer was properly overruled. The jurisdiction of the court cannot 'be successfully questioned. As to an undivided one half of the land, the trust was proved by the written instrument. The trust as to the other half was proved by oral testimony, but by evidence so clear, explicit, and unequivocal as to justify the master and the court in finding that a resulting trust was established.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

An examination of all the numerous assignments discloses no error which demands a reversal of this decree. The demurrer was properly overruled. The jurisdiction of the court cannot 'be successfully questioned. As to an undivided one half of the land, the trust was proved by the written instrument. The trust as to the other half was proved by oral testimony, but by evidence so clear, explicit, and unequivocal as to justify the master and the court in finding that a resulting trust was established.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Sadler 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-jackson-pa-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack