Jackson v. Jackson

115 A. 1, 93 N.J. Eq. 216, 8 Stock. 216, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 279
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 23, 1921·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will "be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Church.

[218]*218For affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenci-iard, Minturn, Black, ILírrenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk — 9. For reversal — Swayze, Parker, Bergen — 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Jackson, 115 A. 1, 93 N.J. Eq. 216, 8 Stock. 216, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 279 (N.J. 1921).

115 A. 1 (Jackson v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Antonucci v. Antonucci
308 A.2d 46 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
Sabia v. Sabia
84 A.2d 559 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)