Jackson v. Hunter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jackson v. Hunter

105 S.E. 637, 26 Ga. App. 116, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 5

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 20, 1921·No. 11203·Published

Opinion

Stephens, J.

According to the answer of the .Supreme Court to a certified question in this case (150 Ga. 789, 105 S. E. 304), it was error to dismiss the affidavit of illegality.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Sill, J., conew.

Affidavit of illegality; from Effingham superior court — Judge Lovett. November 20, 1919.

Sectbroolc & Kennedy, for plaintiffs in error. D. II. Glarh, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

According to the answer of the .Supreme Court to a certified question in this case (150 Ga. 789, 105 S. E. 304), it was error to dismiss the affidavit of illegality.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Sill, J., conew.

Affidavit of illegality; from Effingham superior court — Judge Lovett. November 20, 1919.

Sectbroolc & Kennedy, for plaintiffs in error. D. II. Glarh, contra.

Jackson v. Hunter, 105 S.E. 637, 26 Ga. App. 116, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 5 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

105 S.E. 637 (Jackson v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related