Jackson v. Hunt

New York Supreme Court

Jackson v. Hunt

6 Johns. 16

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1810

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Johns. 16 (Jackson v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Hunt, 6 Johns. 16 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Lantman entered under Fan Sante,

who claimed the land as .his own, for he tells Brott that he was mistaken in thinking the land to be his, and that Lantman must go and live there. The letter of Van Sante, if it had any effect, only suspended the operation of the statute of limitations .during the war. Before 1783, Fan Sante claimed and possessed the land as his own; and the statute of limitations had run out before the commencement of this suit. Judgment must be rendered for the defendant.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Lantman entered under Fan Sante,

who claimed the land as .his own, for he tells Brott that he was mistaken in thinking the land to be his, and that Lantman must go and live there. The letter of Van Sante, if it had any effect, only suspended the operation of the statute of limitations .during the war. Before 1783, Fan Sante claimed and possessed the land as his own; and the statute of limitations had run out before the commencement of this suit. Judgment must be rendered for the defendant.

Judgment for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Johns. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-hunt-nysupct-1810.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack