Home/New York Court of Appeals/Jackson v. Hunt, Hill & Betts

Jackson v. Hunt, Hill & Betts

205 N.E.2d 684, 15 N.Y.2d 784, 257 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1635
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 4, 1965
StatusPublished

This text of 205 N.E.2d 684 (Jackson v. Hunt, Hill & Betts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Hunt, Hill & Betts, 205 N.E.2d 684, 15 N.Y.2d 784, 257 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1635 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Burke dissents and votes to modify the judgment entered after the order of the Appellate Division and to reinstate the order and judgment of Special Term with the exception of the disallowance of the credit of the frozen yen fees and, as so modified, to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.E.2d 684, 15 N.Y.2d 784, 257 N.Y.S.2d 586, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-hunt-hill-betts-ny-1965.