Jackson v. Hudson-Belk Co.
229 N.C. 795
Opinion
The correctness of the ruling of the trial court in allowing motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit finds support in the case of [796]*796Pratt v. Tea Company, 218 N. C. 732, 12 S. E. (2) 242, under authority of which the judgment below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Hudson-Belk Co., 229 N.C. 795 (N.C. 1948).
229 N.C. 795 (Jackson v. Hudson-Belk Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc. v. Mary F. Bailey
271 F.2d 573 (Fourth Circuit, 1959)