Jackson v. Hooper
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6237
GARY JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DARRELL HOOPER, Welding Instructor; PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MRS. OWENS, Vocational Programmer; CASWELL CORRECTIONAL CENTER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (1:05-cv-00096-WWD)
Submitted: September 5, 2007 Decided: September 13, 2007
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Alan S. Hicks, ALAN S. HICKS, P.A., Roxboro, North Carolina; Yvonne Bullock Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Gary Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s* order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jackson v.
Hooper, No. 1:05-cv-00096-WWD (M.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2007).
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jackson v. Hooper (Jackson v. Hooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.