Jackson v. Hooper

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. Hooper. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 F. App'x 949
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 13, 2007·No. 07-6237·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6237

GARY JACKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DARRELL HOOPER, Welding Instructor; PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MRS. OWENS, Vocational Programmer; CASWELL CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (1:05-cv-00096-WWD)

Submitted: September 5, 2007 Decided: September 13, 2007

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Alan S. Hicks, ALAN S. HICKS, P.A., Roxboro, North Carolina; Yvonne Bullock Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Gary Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s* order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jackson v.

Hooper, No. 1:05-cv-00096-WWD (M.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2007).

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Hooper, (4th Cir. 2007).

Jackson v. Hooper (Jackson v. Hooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related