Jackson v. Hood

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 2, 2013
DocketCivil Action No. 2013-1194
StatusPublished

This text of Jackson v. Hood (Jackson v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Hood, (D.D.C. 2013).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT 0F COLUMBIA F I L E D ms - 2 2013 ) ¢, . _ DAVID JACKSON, ) c@§r'§§#;Fzh@'§l§§l§§?‘é§‘§lf’,‘?f§¥ ) l la Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. \ > \ ~'l ‘i` ‘i JIM HOOD, Attorney General ) g for the State of Mississippi, ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

According to the plaintiff, the Offlce of the Attorney General for the State of Mississippi refuses to produce certain public records pertaining to his criminal trial in response to his written request for such records under the Freedom of Inforrnation Act ("FOIA"), see 5 U.S.C. § 5 52. Compl. at 2; see id., Ex. E. He files "[t]his complaint . . . pursuant to 5 U.S.C.A. [§]

552(a)(4)(B) of the Freedom of Inforrnation Act." Compl. at 1.

"[I]t is beyond question that FOIA applies only to federal and not to state agencies." Grand Cent. P ’ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473, 484 (Zd Cir. 1999) (citations Omittcd); 5 U.S.C. § 55l(t) (defining the term "agency" for purposes of the FOIA). Mississippi’s Attorney General is not a federal entity to whom FOIA applies See, e.g., Sykes v. Unitea' States, 507 F. App’x 455, 463 (6th Cir. 2012) (affirming dismissal of FOIA claims against state university medical center); Moreno v. Curry, 2007 WL 4467580, at * 1 (5th Cir. Dec. 20. 2008) (per curiam) (affirrning district court ruling that "FOIA, by its terms, does not apply to state or municipal agencies"); Martinson v. Drug Enforcement Admz`n., 1997 WL 634559, at *l (D.C.

Cir. Sept. 22, 1997) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of complaint against Pennsylvania

Attorney General’s Office because a state agency is not subject to the FOIA); Wz`llz`s v. U.S. Dep ’l of Jusrz'ce, 581 F. Supp. 2d 57, 67-698 (D.D.C. 2008) (dismissing claims against Missouri

Police Department, which is not a federal agency subject to FOlA or the Privacy Act).

Accordingly, The Court will dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which

relief can be granted An Order is issued separately.

DATE; ?z%‘ -¢Z»’~ 7 ~

United States District J e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jackson v. Hood, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-hood-dcd-2013.