Jackson v. Hawks

2 Wend. 619
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Savage, Ch. J.

It is the undoubted right of a party to poll a jury on their bringing in their verdict, and he cannot be deprived of it, but by his express assent. Notwithstanding the practice of the judge, the counsel for the defendant positively states that there was no agreement waiving the right, and that he would not have consented to a sealed verdict had he supposed that he thereby would lose the right of polling the jury. The party, therefore, not having expressly assented, and having been deprived of a right to which he was entitled, the verdict must be set aside; costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. Hawks, 2 Wend. 619 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

2 Wend. 619 (Jackson v. Hawks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duffy v. Vogel
905 N.E.2d 1175 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
Francillo v. Latour
181 A. 698 (Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J., 1935)
District of Columbia v. Humphries
11 App. D.C. 68 (D.C. Circuit, 1897)
Hindrey v. Williams
9 Colo. 371 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1886)
Leighton v. People
10 Abb. N. Cas. 261 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)
James v. State ex rel. Doss
55 Miss. 57 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1877)
Warner v. . New York Central R.R. Co.
52 N.Y. 437 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
Warner v. New York Central Railroad
7 N.Y. 437 (New York Court of Appeals, 1873)
State v. Bogain
12 La. Ann. 264 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1857)
Green v. Bliss
12 How. Pr. 428 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)
Labar v. Koplin
4 N.Y. 546 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
Rigg v. Cook
9 Ill. 336 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1847)
Commonwealth v. Roby
29 Mass. 496 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1832)