Jackson v. Hakemy
This text of 33 F. App'x 336 (Jackson v. Hakemy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Richard Jackson appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his diversity action against Shair Hakemy. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Jackson’s action on comity grounds under the first-to-file rule, in deference to the proceeding which Hakemy had previously filed against Jackson in Texas. Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc., 946 F.2d 622, 625 (9th Cir.1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 F. App'x 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-hakemy-ca9-2002.